|
|
Post by lancsdes on Jun 16, 2019 7:50:04 GMT
Saturday June 15th BOOTLE 67-6 (22.1 overs) (Davies 17; Gailey 3-17) v SOUTHPORT AND BIRKDALE 64 (33.1) (Yates 14, Keedy 14; Purser 4-27, Jhangir Liaqat 3-4) Result: Bootle won by 4 wickets Toss: Southport and Birkdale Points: Bootle (20 pts + 5 bowl pts), Southport and Birkdale (3 bowl pts) ldcc.play-cricket.com/website/results/3763074COLWYN BAY 94 (32.3) (Holtby 22; Hartley 3-28) v ORMSKIRK 220-7d (54.4) (Lavelle 78, Knight 34, Hartley 33*, Mddock 30*, McGladdery 26) Result: Ormskirk won by 126 runs Toss: Colwyn Bay Points: Colwyn Bay (3 bowl pts), Ormskirk (20 pts + 5 bat pts) ldcc.play-cricket.com/website/results/3763082Lavelle 78 off 117 balls, 8 4s, Hartley 33 off 39 with 2 4s, McGladerry 29 Hartley 6.3-2-28-3 Gavin Griffiths, who doesn’t appear to have been in Leicestershire’s first team recently took 6-2-13-1 and was out for 1 for Ormskirk LYTHAM 52 (22.5) (Croft 23; Sephton 5-21, Grey 4-18) v NORTHERN 56-3 (19) (Laker 24*, J Cole 23*) Result: Northern won by 7 wickets Toss: Lytham Points: Lytham (1 bowl pt), Northern (20 pts + 5 bowl pts) ldcc.play-cricket.com/website/results/3763114Lytham’s nightmare season continued. Stephen Croft top scorer with 23. Another duck for Zelem. NEW BRIGHTON 141 (43.4) (Clarke 62; Bulcock 7-68) v LEIGH 147 (52.1) (Farrar 80; Nawab 5-37, Clarke 3-8) Result: Leigh won by 6 runs Toss: New Brighton Points: New Brighton (2 bat pts + 5 bowl pts), Leigh (20 pts + 2 bat pts) ldcc.play-cricket.com/website/results/3763123Exciting looking game here. Two very good slow left armers. ORRELL RED TRIANGLE 173-4d (40) (AJ Mottram 62*, IA Lyon 41, Riley 29; Oldham 3-46) v FORMBY 153 (28.5) (Seward 37, Oldham 36, Sutton 25; Ali Sartaj 6-56) Result: Orrell Red Triangle won by 20 runs (in a match that finished at 8:32pm) Toss: Formby Points: Orrell Red Triangle (20 pts + 3 bat pts), Formby (2 bat pts + 2 bowl pts) ldcc.play-cricket.com/website/results/3763155Sam Oldham 12-1-46-3 and 36 off 39 balls with 1 6 and 2 4’s . Effectively end when he was eighth out. Ben Aithchison out for 3 and 8 overs 1-21 RAINHILL 98 (42) (Rotheram 38, Anuj Dal 23; Ruikar 8-51) v WALLASEY 99-4 (24) (Makol 36, DM Beaver 20) Result: Wallasey won by 6 wickets Toss: Rainhill Points: Rainhill (2 bowl pts), Wallasey (20 pts + 5 bowl pts) ldcc.play-cricket.com/website/results/3763174 |
|
|
|
Post by lancsdes on Jun 16, 2019 14:30:29 GMT
From Liverpool Competition Old website
League 'Chairman' criticises his own league
Friday 14th June 2019
Following his abuse of an umpire in 2017, the most hated Chairman the Liverpool and District Cricket Competition has ever had, and whose sole intention seems to be to spread his poison and destroy the league, has gone to the Liverpool Echo and criticised the league. If, as he claims, standards have dropped, it's only been during his tenure.
The diatribe contains so many inaccuracies that he is once again displaying his ignorance in that he doesn't know the first thing about the Liverpool Competition. Like some many wannabees these days, he should check the facts before he opens his mouth.
Also one supposes that 'his lifetime in cricket' includes the County match he claims to have played for Lancashire and yet the County has no record of a player of his name having ever played for them in any category of match.
He states that "this year, for the first time ever, we're finding clubs unable to field teams at 2nd XI level. We have had examples of some clubs going with seven, eight, nine men, which is unheard of."
This is totally incorrect. In the eighties, when Liverpool and Everton were in FA Cup Finals, we had teams unable to field a 2nd XI on the day.
On 10th September 2011, Parkfield Liscard took seven players to Burscough for a 2nd XI Second Division match. Parkfield tried to hide the fact to avoid paying a £40.00 fine by adding names to the scorecard on play-cricket.com after Burscough had listed the genuine scorecard. The League Secretary was advised at the time and he chose to back Parkfield's story that they had fielded eleven players.
Williams fails to add that his own club, Rainford, is one that fails to fulfil fixtures.
For a person who is on record in the past as saying he wants 'time' cricket abolished, he cannot be allowed to ruin a league that has existed for over 100 years. As one respected person in the Liverpool Competition said "The man's an idiot. Run a league? He couldn't run a bath. If he is allowed to continue, he'll run us into the ground and we won't have any Liverpool Competition at all."
It's one thing to have an idea and another to pass it off as a general consensus. By doing that, if it fails, you don't publicly have egg on your face. It's an old story with the Liverpool Competition committee.
The Committee to which he refers is a 'Gang of Three', of which he is one. The other so called Committee Members are just nodding dogs.
The comment about 'attracting players from elsewhere'. Clubs are paying players from out of the area to come and play for them. It's not a fact that a player wants to play for your club, it's that if enough money is dangled as a carrot, a player will go anywhere.
"Who wants to play Mickey Mouse T20 cricket on a Saturday afternoon? You work all week so you want to spend the whole of Saturday afternoon and early evening with your friends playing a proper game of time cricket with a few beers in the pavilion afterwards."
If numbers are dropping, it's because people just want to play cricket for enjoyment. They don't want to be subjected to draconian rules where you get suspended for four matches for sneezing or fined for shouting 'howzat'.
The late Colin Thompson's son, John, sums things up when he says about his father, "He loved the old school Comp, especially before drink driving became frowned upon. He wasn't a big fan of the expansion and just loved playing, no matter what level it was at."
John continued: "The proper old Comp, no overseas, no need for a full time admin assistant to avoid being fined off the planet, just 22 guys playing hard, honest cricket once or twice a year, before getting absolutely slaughtered after the game, together."
These comments were sent in a private text but it is hoped that John does not object to them being aired in public as they illustrate the feelings of so many people today.
The newspaper article reads:
Change in the air as Liverpool Gin Liverpool Competition seeks to tackle player shortage
Chairman John Williams says nothing is off the table - including a change of format in the lower divisions
It's been the sort of week for Merseyside's cricketers to indulge in some imaginative, blue skies thinking – such as "imagine if there were blue skies".
But while the weather may present an immediate problem for Liverpool Gin Liverpool Competition clubs, league chairman John Williams has an eye on solving a more long term issue – the decline in participation levels.
He and the committee are going to be consulting clubs in September about possible changes - and nothing is off the table.
"Clubs are having difficulty with playing numbers," he said. "The levels of participation in the game are exercising the committee as well as the day to day running.
"We are concerned with the problems clubs are having in fielding teams at 3rd XI – and sadly, this year, for the first time ever, we’re finding clubs are unable to field teams at 2nd XI level.
"We have had examples of some clubs going with seven, eight, nine men, which is unheard of. We take our hat off to them for getting the game on, but it is a real issue."
Some initiatives have already proved popular with clubs. For example, the dual registration scheme – with the Southport and District League last year, and now between Competition clubs below 1st XI level – has allowed those with surplus players to help out those who are struggling.
Now Williams, in his eighth year in the role, thinks it’s time to be braver.
"Personally, I think we need to bite the bullet," he said. "These are good initiatives and the clubs have been very supportive but I really think we need to look at things further.
"Not the structure of the league – the clubs are very happy with that – but we need to look at the format of the games."
This is, safe to say, a big deal. Although the Southport League switched to a 45 over format at the beginning of 2017, timed cricket remains sacrosanct to many, and Williams acknowledges it's one of the reasons for the Competition’s status.
But while he doesn’t foresee any change to the format at 1st XI level, he reckons change might be needed in the lower divisions to make the game more accessible to potential players.
A limited overs format would shorten the time spent playing – for recreational players down the pyramid juggling family, work and other commitments, it could be a deal breaker.
"We know there are many different views on this," Williams said.
"Firstly, we’re looking at ways in which we can shorten the game at the lower reaches of our structure – none of us has found any evidence from clubs that they want 1st XI timed cricket to change, and on a personal level I don't want that to change.
"It encourages proper cricket and it's applauded by the players.
"I think it's one of the reasons the Comp attracts players from elsewhere – and better players attract better players.
"So we've no intention of changing that.
"But for 2nd and 3rd XIs, we've got to look at ways to make the game more attractive.
"So we're looking at ways to shorten the length of time spent playing.
"Automatically you think of T20 – I personally wouldn't want to just introduce T20 cricket on a Saturday per se, but we might make that an offer for some 3rd XIs who’d prefer play in a T20 league, and there may be some clubs who prefer to play the timed games."
Ultimately, Williams believes the way forward is to offer a "menu of cricket" – ECB speak for "different strokes for different folks".
“We've got over 1,400 people playing every weekend," he added. "It's big enough to have a menu that will fit everyone’s social, personal and ability requirements."
He believes it's essential that the youngsters attracted to the game by the ECB's All Stars programme – "in my lifetime in cricket, the best initiative clubs have ever had" – are given the chance to play as they grow older.
That's another reason for potentially reducing the amount of time taken up by senior games, to make room for the kids.
He added: "We as a league have got to consider all this.
"So what we're going to do is consider some offers which we’ll be making to our clubs at the AGM in January – but before we do that, we'll have a series of consultations starting as soon as the season finishes in September.
"We don’t know what the outcome of all this will be. But we cannot sit back and do nothing and watch the clubs struggling to put teams out.
"And we can’t rely on other people; as a league, we've got a responsibility to get more people enjoying the game."
(first published in the Liverpool Echo)
|
|
|
|
Post by apm51054 on Jun 22, 2019 19:23:23 GMT
Tarleton 156-8
Wyre 80
Moi run out 2 suicide run
|
|
|
|
Post by lancsdes on Jun 23, 2019 7:30:01 GMT
BOOTLE 220-  (55.0 overs) (Davies 65, Purser 30, Farrell 28, Barker 27; Rotherham 3-40, Bulcock 3-68) v LEIGH 129 (37.5) (Pearson 32, Bulcock 32; Butterworth 4-36, Barker 4-48) Result: Bootle won by 91 runs Toss: Bootle Points: Bootle (20 pts + 5 bat pts), Leigh (1 bat pt + 4 bowl pts) ldcc.play-cricket.com/website/results/3763067COLWYN BAY 146 (48.2) (Jenkins 44, Jeewantha 37, Ramsden 27; Keedy 8-25) v SOUTHPORT AND BIRKDALE 148-2 (37.4) (Yates 73, Affleck 66* [121-2nd wkt]) Result: Southport and Birkdale won by 8 wickets Toss: Southport and Birkdale Points: Colwyn Bay (2 bat pts + 1 bowl pt), Southport and Birkdale (20 pts) ldcc.play-cricket.com/website/results/3763085NEW BRIGHTON 118-2 (21.4) (Clarke 53*, DR While 31*) v LYTHAM 114 (43.4) (Fiddler 37, Taaffe 28*; DR While 5-33, Nawab 3-33) Result: New Brighton won by 8 wickets Toss: Lytham Points: New Brighton (20 pts + 5 bowl pts), Lytham (1 bat pt +bowl pt) ldcc.play-cricket.com/website/results/3763124ORMSKIRK 175-8 (46.3) (Knight 59*, Griffiths 25; Ruikar 3-58) v WALLASEY 169 (54.3) (DM Beaver 75, Meehan 25; Hartley 5-51) Result: Ormskirk won by 2 wickets Toss: Wallasey Points: Ormskirk (20 pts + 5 bowl pts), Wallasey(3 bat pts + 4 bowl pts) ldcc.play-cricket.com/website/results/3763152 ORRELL RED TRIANGLE 76 (39) (Heeley 22*; Sephton 4-12, Grey 3-27, Houghton 3-35) v NORTHERN 77-1 (13.4) (Cornall 47*, Laker 26*) Result: Northern won by 9 wickets at 5:12pm Toss: Orrell Red Triangle Points: Orrell Red Triangle (0 pts), Northern (20 pts + 5 bowl pts) ldcc.play-cricket.com/website/results/3763159RAINHILL 163 (47.1) (Qaisar Ashraf 39, Higham 23; Aitchison 5-35, Sutton 3-20) v FORMBY 143 (53.3) (Oldham 55, Atkinson 25; Qaisar Ashraf 4-62, Kelly 3-33) Result: Rainhill won by 20 runs Toss: Rainhill Points: Rainhill (20 pts + 3 bat pts), Formby (2 bat pts + 5 bowl pts) ldcc.play-cricket.com/website/results/3763166ECB Premier League Saturday 22nd June 2019 ECB PREMIER LEAGUE . . . . . . . . . . bonus points . . . . . . . . . . . . W W D/L D/L pen . . P W WCn WDf T D (D) L LCn LDf ND (ND) Ab bat bwl bat bwl pts PTS . . 20 25 25 15 . . -10 -10 5 5 . . . . . . 1 Bootle 9 6 0 0 0 0 (0) 1 0 0 0 (0) 2 5 20 3 5 0 163 2 New Brighton 9 5 0 0 0 1 (0) 2 0 0 0 (0) 1 4 10 5 14 0 138 3 Northern 9 4 0 0 0 1 (0) 2 0 0 0 (0) 2 0 20 4 11 0 125 4 Ormskirk 9 4 0 0 0 0 (0) 3 0 0 0 (0) 2 14 5 8 7 0 124 5 Formby 9 4 0 0 0 2 (0) 2 0 0 0 (0) 1 5 8 13 13 0 124 6 Rainhill 9 4 0 0 0 0 (0) 3 0 0 0 (0) 2 12 0 4 4 0 110 7 Leigh 9 3 0 0 0 1 (0) 3 0 0 0 (0) 2 2 0 11 14 0 97 8 Orrell Red Triangle 9 3 0 0 0 1 (0) 3 0 0 0 (0) 2 9 0 7 8 0 94 9 Wallasey 9 2 0 0 0 3 (0) 2 0 0 0 (0) 2 3 5 9 18 0 85 10 Southport and Birkdale 9 2 0 0 0 0 (0) 5 0 0 1 (0) 1 2 0 8 17 0 77 11 Colwyn Bay 9 0 0 0 0 1 (0) 6 0 0 0 (0) 2 0 0 13 17 0 40 12 Lytham 9 0 0 0 0 2 (0) 5 0 0 1 (0) 1 0 0 11 17 0 38 |
|
|
|
Post by lancsdes on Jun 23, 2019 19:47:47 GMT
“Tarleton 156-8 Wyre 80 Moi run out 2 suicide run” All runs are suicidal once you are over 50 APM! You will have to take the Chris Gayle approach 😀 |
|
|
|
Post by lancsdes on Jun 24, 2019 10:22:08 GMT
Apart from Gary Keedy’s exceptional performance on which I’ve commented on his thread, not a great deal of County or ex County interest in the scores above.
Lytham without Croft or Lester and with Zelem still having a nightmare , lost yet again.
Ben Aitchison 15-4-35-5 opening bowling for Formby and 18 not out must have felt a bit sore at losing . Sam Oldham 55 off 89 balls with 7 4s and a six also for the losers.
Dan Houghton’s encouraging start for Northern continued 11-1-35-3. Taylor Cornall’s 49 not out can hardly have been under any pressure chasing 77.
Gavin Griffiths only bowled 4 overs for Ormskirk. Took nought for 19. He made 25 with 5 4s. Tom Hartley took 23.3-5-51-6.
McGladdery and Lavelle both out for low scores but ex seconds wicketkeeper Gary Knight with 59 not out from 80 balls with 4 4s , 3 6s saw Ormskirk through with help from Griffiths and Nicky Caunce.
|
|
|
|
Post by apm51054 on Jun 24, 2019 11:48:03 GMT
From Liverpool Competition Old website League 'Chairman' criticises his own league Friday 14th June 2019 Following his abuse of an umpire in 2017, the most hated Chairman the Liverpool and District Cricket Competition has ever had, and whose sole intention seems to be to spread his poison and destroy the league, has gone to the Liverpool Echo and criticised the league. If, as he claims, standards have dropped, it's only been during his tenure. The diatribe contains so many inaccuracies that he is once again displaying his ignorance in that he doesn't know the first thing about the Liverpool Competition. Like some many wannabees these days, he should check the facts before he opens his mouth. Also one supposes that 'his lifetime in cricket' includes the County match he claims to have played for Lancashire and yet the County has no record of a player of his name having ever played for them in any category of match. He states that "this year, for the first time ever, we're finding clubs unable to field teams at 2nd XI level. We have had examples of some clubs going with seven, eight, nine men, which is unheard of." This is totally incorrect. In the eighties, when Liverpool and Everton were in FA Cup Finals, we had teams unable to field a 2nd XI on the day. On 10th September 2011, Parkfield Liscard took seven players to Burscough for a 2nd XI Second Division match. Parkfield tried to hide the fact to avoid paying a £40.00 fine by adding names to the scorecard on play-cricket.com after Burscough had listed the genuine scorecard. The League Secretary was advised at the time and he chose to back Parkfield's story that they had fielded eleven players. Williams fails to add that his own club, Rainford, is one that fails to fulfil fixtures. For a person who is on record in the past as saying he wants 'time' cricket abolished, he cannot be allowed to ruin a league that has existed for over 100 years. As one respected person in the Liverpool Competition said "The man's an idiot. Run a league? He couldn't run a bath. If he is allowed to continue, he'll run us into the ground and we won't have any Liverpool Competition at all." It's one thing to have an idea and another to pass it off as a general consensus. By doing that, if it fails, you don't publicly have egg on your face. It's an old story with the Liverpool Competition committee. The Committee to which he refers is a 'Gang of Three', of which he is one. The other so called Committee Members are just nodding dogs. The comment about 'attracting players from elsewhere'. Clubs are paying players from out of the area to come and play for them. It's not a fact that a player wants to play for your club, it's that if enough money is dangled as a carrot, a player will go anywhere. "Who wants to play Mickey Mouse T20 cricket on a Saturday afternoon? You work all week so you want to spend the whole of Saturday afternoon and early evening with your friends playing a proper game of time cricket with a few beers in the pavilion afterwards." If numbers are dropping, it's because people just want to play cricket for enjoyment. They don't want to be subjected to draconian rules where you get suspended for four matches for sneezing or fined for shouting 'howzat'. The late Colin Thompson's son, John, sums things up when he says about his father, "He loved the old school Comp, especially before drink driving became frowned upon. He wasn't a big fan of the expansion and just loved playing, no matter what level it was at." John continued: "The proper old Comp, no overseas, no need for a full time admin assistant to avoid being fined off the planet, just 22 guys playing hard, honest cricket once or twice a year, before getting absolutely slaughtered after the game, together." These comments were sent in a private text but it is hoped that John does not object to them being aired in public as they illustrate the feelings of so many people today. The newspaper article reads: Change in the air as Liverpool Gin Liverpool Competition seeks to tackle player shortage
Chairman John Williams says nothing is off the table - including a change of format in the lower divisions
It's been the sort of week for Merseyside's cricketers to indulge in some imaginative, blue skies thinking – such as "imagine if there were blue skies".
But while the weather may present an immediate problem for Liverpool Gin Liverpool Competition clubs, league chairman John Williams has an eye on solving a more long term issue – the decline in participation levels.
He and the committee are going to be consulting clubs in September about possible changes - and nothing is off the table.
"Clubs are having difficulty with playing numbers," he said. "The levels of participation in the game are exercising the committee as well as the day to day running.
"We are concerned with the problems clubs are having in fielding teams at 3rd XI – and sadly, this year, for the first time ever, we’re finding clubs are unable to field teams at 2nd XI level.
"We have had examples of some clubs going with seven, eight, nine men, which is unheard of. We take our hat off to them for getting the game on, but it is a real issue."
Some initiatives have already proved popular with clubs. For example, the dual registration scheme – with the Southport and District League last year, and now between Competition clubs below 1st XI level – has allowed those with surplus players to help out those who are struggling.
Now Williams, in his eighth year in the role, thinks it’s time to be braver.
"Personally, I think we need to bite the bullet," he said. "These are good initiatives and the clubs have been very supportive but I really think we need to look at things further.
"Not the structure of the league – the clubs are very happy with that – but we need to look at the format of the games."
This is, safe to say, a big deal. Although the Southport League switched to a 45 over format at the beginning of 2017, timed cricket remains sacrosanct to many, and Williams acknowledges it's one of the reasons for the Competition’s status.
But while he doesn’t foresee any change to the format at 1st XI level, he reckons change might be needed in the lower divisions to make the game more accessible to potential players.
A limited overs format would shorten the time spent playing – for recreational players down the pyramid juggling family, work and other commitments, it could be a deal breaker.
"We know there are many different views on this," Williams said.
"Firstly, we’re looking at ways in which we can shorten the game at the lower reaches of our structure – none of us has found any evidence from clubs that they want 1st XI timed cricket to change, and on a personal level I don't want that to change.
"It encourages proper cricket and it's applauded by the players.
"I think it's one of the reasons the Comp attracts players from elsewhere – and better players attract better players.
"So we've no intention of changing that.
"But for 2nd and 3rd XIs, we've got to look at ways to make the game more attractive.
"So we're looking at ways to shorten the length of time spent playing.
"Automatically you think of T20 – I personally wouldn't want to just introduce T20 cricket on a Saturday per se, but we might make that an offer for some 3rd XIs who’d prefer play in a T20 league, and there may be some clubs who prefer to play the timed games."
Ultimately, Williams believes the way forward is to offer a "menu of cricket" – ECB speak for "different strokes for different folks".
“We've got over 1,400 people playing every weekend," he added. "It's big enough to have a menu that will fit everyone’s social, personal and ability requirements."
He believes it's essential that the youngsters attracted to the game by the ECB's All Stars programme – "in my lifetime in cricket, the best initiative clubs have ever had" – are given the chance to play as they grow older.
That's another reason for potentially reducing the amount of time taken up by senior games, to make room for the kids.
He added: "We as a league have got to consider all this.
"So what we're going to do is consider some offers which we’ll be making to our clubs at the AGM in January – but before we do that, we'll have a series of consultations starting as soon as the season finishes in September.
"We don’t know what the outcome of all this will be. But we cannot sit back and do nothing and watch the clubs struggling to put teams out.
"And we can’t rely on other people; as a league, we've got a responsibility to get more people enjoying the game."
(first published in the Liverpool Echo) Only just read this post, Des, we are still playing 45 overs per side however no draws personally would love to back to the time you could actually play for a draw when chasing totals well over 200. Game basically over if you are trying to chase that down especially in the lower divisions. Originally played time cricket no limit on how long you could bat and 8 ball overs as well |
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jun 29, 2019 16:59:27 GMT
Wyre 1st 57 all out
Norcross 2nd 59-1
Should have been LBW for 0 made second top score of 10
|
|
|
|
Post by lancsdes on Jun 30, 2019 9:02:28 GMT
Saturday June 29th Bowlers dominating in the sweaty heat with New Brighton’s 192 the highest score FORMBY 103 (34.1 overs) (Taibu 34, Atchison 22; Purser 7-48) v BOOTLE 104-3 (21.0) (Davies 45*, Farrell 35*) Result: Bootle won by 7 wickets Toss: Formby Points: Formby (1 bat pt + 1 bowl pt), Bootle (20 pts + 5 bowl pts) ldcc.play-cricket.com/website/results/376308722 and 10-2-30-2 for Ben Aitchison including bowling Will Hale for 16. Duck for Sam Oldham LEIGH 85 (34.1) (Davies 20; Hartley 4-18) v ORMSKIRK 86-7 (27) (McGladdery 21; Housley 3-30) Result: Ormskirk won by 3 wickets Toss: Leigh Points: Leigh (3 bowl pts), Ormskirk (20 pts + 5 bowl pts) ldcc.play-cricket.com/website/results/3763104Low scores for all the Ormskirk big guns. Tyler McGladdery with the best ; 21 from 26. Tom Hartley the match winner with 9.1-3-18-4 and a six in his 11. Leigh still missing Matt McKiernan. LYTHAM 48 (29) (Jefferson 14; Qaiser Ashraf 7-22) v RAINHILL 115 (36.4) (Anuj Dal 35; B Saunders 3-21, Mason 3-23) Result: Rainhill won by 67 runs Toss: Rainhill Points: Lytham (5 bowl pts), Rainhill (20 pts + 1 bat pt) ldcc.play-cricket.com/website/results/3763117No Stephen Croft or Toby Lester for hapless Lytham NORTHERN 129-7 (40.4) (Grey 26, J Cole 24*; Keedy 3-24) v SOUTHPORT AND BIRKDALE 128 (51.5) (Yates 45; Sephton 4-31, Houghton 4-57) Result: Northern won by 3 wickets Toss: Southport and Birkdale Points: Northern (20 pts + 5 bowl pts), Southport and Birkdale (1 bat pt + 3 bowl 2) ldcc.play-cricket.com/website/results/3763140Dan Houghton 14.5-2-57-4. Moves to Northern don’t always go well for promising young cricketers but it does seem to be going well for him. Always looked a good bowler at Rainford but rarely took the wickets to justify it. Maybe some hope with Lancashire still though the seam bowling at Lancashire is difficult to break into. ORRELL RED TRIANGLE 116 (40.5) (Baybutt 44, Minhaj Bhada 21, Heeley 20; Nawab 8-49) v NEW BRIGHTON 192 (51.1) (Rowland 67, Clarke 48; Ali Sartaj 3-56) Result: New Brighton won by 76 runs Toss: New Brighton Points: Orrell Red Triangle (1 bat pt + 5 bowl pts), New Brighton (20 pts + 4 bat pts) ldcc.play-cricket.com/website/results/3763158No County interest of which I’m aware and also the same at Wallasey. WALLASEY 103 (44) (Ruikar 23, Meehan 20, Leckey 20; Jeewantha 9-39) v COLWYN BAY 119 (47) (Johansen 33; GJ Beaver 4-9, Ruikar 4-34) Result: Colwyn Bay won by 16 runs Toss: Colwyn Bay Points: Wallasey (1 bat pt + 5 bowl pts), Colwyn Bay (20 pts + 1 bat pt) ldcc.play-cricket.com/website/results/3763187 |
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jul 6, 2019 19:16:30 GMT
Bretherton 1st 98
Wyre 2nds 71
First ever game as captain registered a DONALD
|
|
|
|
Post by lancsdes on Jul 6, 2019 22:47:04 GMT
More details to follow tomorrow
Saturday July 6th
BOOTLE 224-7d (52.0 overs) (Kershaw 83, Tripathi 39, Davies 28; Mason 3-74)
v LYTHAM 213 (51.5) (Mason 72, B Saunders 53, Howarth 26, Zelem 23; Purser 3-24, Butterworth 3-53, Jhangir Liaqat 3-64)
Result: Bootle won by 11 runs
Toss: Lytham
Points: Bootle (20 pts + 5 bat pts), Lytham (4 bat pts + 3 bowl pts)
COLWYN BAY 165-8 (49) (Jeewantha 44*, Johansen 28; Bulcock 3-37)
v LEIGH 224-5d (55) (55 overs = 224-5) (Foster 82*, Hulbert 46*, Shallcross 23, Bulcock 20; Jeewantha 3-47)
Result: match drawn
Toss: Colwyn Bay
Points: Colwyn Bay (3 bat pts + 2 bowl pts), Leigh (5 bat pts + 4 bowl pts)
NEW BRIGHTON 221-4 (56.3) (Clarke 139, TFW Horrocks 49* [172-3rd wkt], LC Botes 24*)
v NORTHERN 220-5d (49.4) (Cornall 82, J Cole 70 [134-4th wkt], Boardman 41*)
Result: New Brighton won by 6 wickets
Toss: New Brighton
Points: New Brighton (20 pts), Northern (5 bat pts + 2 bowl pts)
ORMSKIRK 204-6 (47.1) (Knight 70, Hartley 67* [119-6th wkt], McGladdery 24; Aitchison 4-35)
v FORMBY 201 (51.1) (Underwood 50, Taibu 40, Aitchison 28, Vahaluwala 22; Caunce 3-25)
Result: Ormskirk won by 4 wickets
Toss: Formby
Points: Ormskirk (20 pts + 5 bowl pts), Formby (4 bat pts + 3 bowl pts)
RAINHILL 156-6 (40.3) (Qaiser Ashraf 47*, Vandome 21; Ali Sartaj 3-67)
v ORRELL RED TRIANGLE 153 (61.1) (55 overs = 122-5) (AJ Mottram 79* [carried bat]; Qaiser Ashraf 5-53, Kelly 5-65)
Result: Rainhill won by 4 wickets
Toss: Orrell Red Triangle
Points: Rainhill (20 pts + 5 bowl pts), Orrell Red Triangle (1 bat pt + 3 bowl pts)
SOUTHPORT AND BIRKDALE 41 (16.1) (J Baybutt 17; Ruikar 7-26)
v WALLASEY 213-7d (55) (55 overs = 213-7) (Ruikar 43, Davies 41, DM Beaver 29, Meehan 29, Eagles 25; Firth 3-67)
Result: Wallasey won by 172 runs
Toss: Wallasey
Points: Southport and Birkdale (3 bowl pts), Wallasey (20 pts + 4 bat pts)
. . . . . . . . . .
bonus points
. .
. . . . . . . . . . W W D/L D/L pen .
. P W WCn WDf T D (D) L LCn LDf ND (ND) Ab bat bwl bat bwl pts
PTS
. . 20 25 25 15 . . -10 -10 5 5 . . . . . .
1 Bootle 11 8 0 0 0 0 (0) 1 0 0 0 (0) 2 10 25 3 5 0 213
2 New Brighton 11 7 0 0 0 1 (0) 2 0 0 0 (0) 1 8 10 5 14 0 182
3 Ormskirk 11 6 0 0 0 0 (0) 3 0 0 0 (0) 2 14 15 8 7 0 174
4 Northern 11 5 0 0 0 1 (0) 3 0 0 0 (0) 2 0 25 9 13 0 157
5 Rainhill 11 6 0 0 0 0 (0) 3 0 0 0 (0) 2 13 5 4 4 0 156
6 Formby 11 4 0 0 0 2 (0) 4 0 0 0 (0) 1 5 8 18 17 0 133
7 Wallasey 11 3 0 0 0 3 (0) 3 0 0 0 (0) 2 7 5 10 23 0 115
8 Leigh 11 3 0 0 0 2 (0) 4 0 0 0 (0) 2 2 0 16 21 0 109
9 Orrell Red Triangle 11 3 0 0 0 1 (0) 5 0 0 0 (0) 2 9 0 9 16 0 104
10 Southport and Birkdale 11 2 0 0 0 0 (0) 7 0 0 1 (0) 1 2 0 9 23 0 84
11 Colwyn Bay 11 1 0 0 0 2 (0) 6 0 0 0 (0) 2 1 0 16 19 0 66
12 Lytham 11 0 0 0 0 2 (0) 7 0 0 1 (0) 1 0 0 15 25 0 50
_________________
|
|
|
|
Post by lancsdes on Jul 8, 2019 19:11:14 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by chris on Jul 8, 2019 21:48:57 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by apm51054 on Jul 13, 2019 19:22:52 GMT
Another 0 crap game over by 3.40 all out for 66 Blackpool 4ths 68/1
|
|
|
|
Post by lancsdes on Jul 13, 2019 22:46:47 GMT
Saturday July 13th FORMBY 259-4d (49.0 overs) (Taibu 144*, Sutton 52 [126-2nd wkt]) v COLWYN BAY 253-7 (55) (Morris 109, Campion 71 [163-4th wkt], Ramsden 25, Gidlow 20; Sutton 3-41) Result: match drawn Toss: Formby Points: Formby (5 bat pts + 3 bowl pts), Colwyn Bay (5 bat pts + 2 bowl pts) ldcc.play-cricket.com/website/results/3763088Sam Oldham out cheaply. Just one wicket today for Ben Aitchison ( 1 -28) and none for Oldham, his 10 overs going at over five per over. Colwyn Bay making an excellent fist of the big target and presumably quite an exciting finish. LEIGH 102 (42.3) (Farrar 39; Keedy 6-23, Firth 3-40) v SOUTHPORT AND BIRKDALE 220-6d (58.2) (55 overs = 200-5) (Phillips 54*, Affleck 51, Lea 44, Yates 20, Gailey 20) Result: Southport and Birkdale won by 118 runs Toss: Southport and Birkdale Points: Leigh (1 bat pt + 3 bowl pts), Southport and Birkdale (20 pts) ldcc.play-cricket.com/website/results/3763107Danny Lamb six overs for 25 and out for 1 for Leigh. Gary Keedy 16.3-5-23-6 LYTHAM 144 (36.2) (M Cartmell 53, B Saunders 25; Maddock 4-39, Lees 3-23, Hartley 3-45) v ORMSKIRK 242-3d (53.1) (ADJ Rankin 126*, Lavelle 56 [109-3rd wkt]) Result: Ormskirk won by 98 runs Toss: Ormskirk Points: Lytham (2 bat pts + 1 bowl pt), Ormskirk (20 pts + 5 bat pts) ldcc.play-cricket.com/website/results/3763115George’s Lavelle’s 56 off 71 balls with 7 4s. Tom Hartley 12-3-45-3. Tyler McGladdery out for 14 NEW BRIGHTON 146 (57) (55 overs = 140-8) (DR While 65; Davies 3-22, Qaiser Ashraf 3-49) v RAINHILL 148-7 (36.2) (Veacock 43, Qaiser Ashraf 29, Clarke 28*; Nawab 4-60) Result: Rainhill won by 3 wickets Toss: New Brighton Points: New Brighton (2 bat pts + 3 bowl pts), Rainhill (20 pts + 5 bowl pts) ldcc.play-cricket.com/website/results/3763128Not aware of any County interest here NORTHERN 109-6 (37) (Cornall 56*; Ruikar 3-34, Meehan 3-43) v WALLASEY 108 (57.4) (55 overs = 108-9) (Cross 40; Sephton 18.4-12-14-4) Result: Northern won by 4 wickets Toss: Wallasey Points: Northern (20 pts + 5 bowl pts), Wallasey (1 bat pt + 3 bowl pts) ldcc.play-cricket.com/website/results/3763141Taylor Cornall’s 56 not out from 105 balls with 6 4s steadying a rather jittery Northern win. 6 overs , one for seven for Dan Houghton. ORRELL RED TRIANGLE 198 (55.2) (55 overs = 198-9) (AJ Mottram 73*, Baybutt 41*, Minhaj Bhada 37, Heeley 21; Davies 3-13, Tripathi 3-47, Purser 3-65) v BOOTLE 202-9 (52.4) (Tripathi 36, Purser 36, Hale 31, Davies 29, Williams 22*; Minhaj Bhada 6-76) Result: Bootle won by 1 wicket Toss: Orrell Red Triangle Points: Orrell Red Triangle (4 bat pts + 4 bowl pts), Bootle (20 pts + 5 bowl pts) ldcc.play-cricket.com/website/results/3763153Orrell Red Triangle putting up some really worthy performances in the Premier League even though they are in quite a lowly position. Bootle have that champion look again with everybody chipping in despite Will Hale having a moderate season by his high standards. . . . . . . . . . bonus points . . . . . . . . . . . . W W D/L D/L pen . . P W WCn WDf T D (D) L LCn LDf ND (ND) Ab bat bwl bat bwl pts PTS . . 20 25 25 15 . . -10 -10 5 5 . . . . . . 1 Bootle 12 9 0 0 0 0 (0) 1 0 0 0 (0) 2 10 30 3 5 0 238 2 Ormskirk 12 7 0 0 0 0 (0) 3 0 0 0 (0) 2 19 15 8 7 0 199 3 New Brighton 12 7 0 0 0 1 (0) 3 0 0 0 (0) 1 8 10 7 17 0 187 4 Northern 12 6 0 0 0 1 (0) 3 0 0 0 (0) 2 0 30 9 13 0 182 5 Rainhill 12 7 0 0 0 0 (0) 3 0 0 0 (0) 2 13 10 4 4 0 181 6 Formby 12 4 0 0 0 3 (0) 4 0 0 0 (0) 1 5 8 23 20 0 141 7 Wallasey 12 3 0 0 0 3 (0) 4 0 0 0 (0) 2 7 5 11 26 0 119 8 Leigh 12 3 0 0 0 2 (0) 5 0 0 0 (0) 2 2 0 17 24 0 113 9 Orrell Red Triangle 12 3 0 0 0 1 (0) 6 0 0 0 (0) 2 9 0 13 20 0 112 10 Southport and Birkdale 12 3 0 0 0 0 (0) 7 0 0 1 (0) 1 2 0 9 23 0 104 11 Colwyn Bay 12 1 0 0 0 3 (0) 6 0 0 0 (0) 2 1 0 21 21 0 73 12 Lytham 12 0 0 0 0 2 (0) 8 0 0 1 (0) 1 0 0 16 28 0 54 |
|
(55.0 overs) (Davies 65, Purser 30, Farrell 28, Barker 27; Rotherham 3-40, Bulcock 3-68)
